POSTGRANTREVIEW.com Notes from a Post Grant Review

PGR · Table of Authorities

Table of Authorities — U.S. Patent No. 12,460,537 B2

Cases — U.S. Supreme Court

  • Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, 598 U.S. 594 (2023) — PDF
  • Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966) — PDF
  • KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398 (2007) — PDF
  • Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., 572 U.S. 898 (2014) — PDF

Cases — Federal Circuit & CCPA

  • Ariad Pharms., Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (en banc) — PDF
  • BASF Corp. v. Johnson Matthey Inc., 875 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2017) — PDF
  • Dyfan, LLC v. Target Corp., 28 F.4th 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2022) — view
  • Energizer Holdings, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 435 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (distinguished) — view
  • Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, 108 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 1997) — view
  • Hybritech Inc. v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc., 802 F.2d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 1986) — view
  • In re Antor Media Corp., 689 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2012) — PDF
  • In re Arkley, 455 F.2d 586 (CCPA 1972) — view
  • In re Bond, 910 F.2d 831 (Fed. Cir. 1990) — view
  • In re Gleave, 560 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2009) — view
  • In re GPAC, Inc., 57 F.3d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1995) — view
  • In re Magnum Oil Tools Int'l, Ltd., 829 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2016) — PDF
  • In re Slayter, 276 F.2d 408 (CCPA 1960) — view
  • In re Steele, 305 F.2d 859 (CCPA 1962) — view
  • In re Wands, 858 F.2d 731 (Fed. Cir. 1988) — view
  • Intelligent Bio-Sys., Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Ltd., 821 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2016) — PDF
  • Lockwood v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 107 F.3d 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1997) — view
  • Net MoneyIN, Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc., 545 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2008) — PDF
  • Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en banc) — PDF
  • Samsung Elecs. Am., Inc. v. Prisua Eng'g Corp., 948 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2020) — PDF
  • TurboCare Div. of Demag Delaval Turbomach. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 264 F.3d 1111 (Fed. Cir. 2001) — view
  • Verdegaal Bros. v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 814 F.2d 628 (Fed. Cir. 1987) — view
  • Vivid Techs., Inc. v. Am. Sci. & Eng'g, Inc., 200 F.3d 795 (Fed. Cir. 1999) — view
  • Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC, 792 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (en banc in relevant part) — PDF
  • Zeroclick, LLC v. Apple Inc., 891 F.3d 1003 (Fed. Cir. 2018) — view

Decisions — PTAB & BPAI

  • Ex parte Catan, Appeal 2007-0820 (BPAI July 3, 2007) (precedential) — PDF
  • Ex parte Catlin, Appeal 2007-3072 (BPAI Feb. 3, 2009) (precedential) — PDF
  • Ex parte Rodriguez, Appeal 2008-000693 (BPAI Oct. 1, 2009) (precedential) — PDF
  • Ex parte Schulhauser, Appeal 2013-007847 (PTAB Apr. 28, 2016) (precedential) — PDF
  • Lectrosonics, Inc. v. Zaxcom, Inc., IPR2018-01129, Paper 33 (PTAB Jan. 24, 2020) (precedential) — PDF

Statutes, regulations, and other authorities

  • 35 U.S.C. §§ 100(i), 102, 103, 112, 122(e), 321, 322(a)(3), 324(a), 325(a), 326(e)
  • 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.290, 42.6, 42.8, 42.10, 42.15(b), 42.22, 42.24, 42.63(e), 42.200(b), 42.202–42.205
  • MPEP § 2131.02
  • USPTO Memorandum, Approach to Indefiniteness Under 35 U.S.C. § 112 in AIA Post-Grant Proceedings (Jan. 6, 2021) — PDF